- This is an invalid argument because of structural fallacy.
- Analysis:
Fallacy type: Arguing backwards with all.
All I need is all I got
Levis jeans is all I got
______________________________
Conclusion: Therefore, All I need is Levis jeans.
This conclusion is invalid and weak because if we say that all we got and we need is only Levis jeans, which is impossible and unreasonable.
well, first of all, the picture is very impressive :)). I like it a lot
Trả lờiXóaHowever you should prove your ideas more specfic. In that case, you better name the formular form for this kind of method
thanks for your entry
hj, Phuong!
Trả lờiXóai'm very interested in your entry. the picture really impresses me. however, it seems that you forgot to add the source, which makes me a bit confused. i' m not sure whether the second premise you pointed out is actually what the ad means or not. I think you should give the source of this ad so that its meaning can be made clear. ;)
Cheer,
Thu