Thứ Sáu, 25 tháng 11, 2011

Entry 4_ Nguyen Thi Trang


Entry 4: Analyzing Argument



- This is an invalid argument because of structural fallacies.
- Analysis:

Denying the antecedent
If A, then B.
Not A,
Therefore, not B

If you drink Pepsi, you will make a difference. This means that you will be outstanding and cool among normal people. (one white people drinking Pepsi is standing in front of a group black people)
If you do not drink Pepsi, you will not have any differences.
However, you can make a difference by many other ways, probably not like this.

Reference:




3 nhận xét:

  1. hey,Trang! I totally agree with your analysis. In this advertising poster, they make mistake about structure of argument. You have a good job

    Trả lờiXóa
  2. HiTrang!
    I have just looked on your entry and I found it very interesting and easy to understand. Your entry is extremely well-done .I totally agree with your analysis
    I like your entry very much. Thanks a lot!

    Trả lờiXóa
  3. Personally, I think you did a good job. Your entry is short but concise, esay to understand. Congratulation:D

    Trả lờiXóa